Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Warren K. Henness, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 19-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio, UNKNOWN PHARMACIES, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE and others
Other:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN K. HENNESS
Christopher Riley, et al v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis, et al
as 17-5621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RILEY and LYNN RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
METHODIST HEALTHCARE MEMPHIS HOSPITALS, aka Methodist University Hospital, SEMMES MURPHEY CLINIC, P.C., L. MADISON MICHAEL and others
Cynthia Boyd, et al v. Kingdom Trust Company, et al
as 17-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA H. BOYD and THOMAS E. FLANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
KINGDOM TRUST COMPANY, PENSCO TRUST COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-6211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ricky Robertson v. Bedford County, Tennessee, et al
as 14-5474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEDFORD COUNTY, TENNESSEE and KEVIN RODDY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25
Kenneth McElroy, et al v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 13-6185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH RAY MCELROY and JANET MCELROY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tricia Lewis, et al v. Myron Wheatley, et al
as 12-3462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRICIA LEWIS, DRAKE LEWIS and MALEAH YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
MYRON D. WHEATLEY, DEBORAH WHEATLEY, PAUL BUNYAN ENTERPRISES INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
