Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Michael Rich v. USA
as 24-1430
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KENNETH RICH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Jeffrey Hughes v. Zane Duncan, et al
as 22-6004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY HUGHES
Defendant / Appellee:
ZANE DUNCAN, GARY M. FAULCON, TIM GOBBLE and others
Tricia Martinez v. Rich Wolowski, et al
as 22-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRICIA MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
RICH WOLOWSKI, Chief Executive Officer of Gordon Food Store, in his personal and professional capacity, TED FINCO, Store Manager of Gordon Food Store, in his personal and professional capacity and DOUG BORDEAU, Assistant Manager of Gordon Food Store, in his personal and professional capacity
Trevor Joyce v. David Rich, et al
as 22-1803
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TREVOR JOYCE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RICH, D RICH TRUCKING, LLC, FOUR STAR TRANSPORTATION CO. and others
Morris Rucker v. Jim Purviance, et al
as 22-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS RUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM PURVIANCE, Executive Director of the Tennessee Board of Parole, RICHARD MONTGOMERY, Tennessee Chairman, ZANE DUNCAN, Tennessee Board Member, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Bill Sourinho v. Rich Products Corporation
as 21-5289
Defendant / Appellee:
RICH PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILL SOURINHO
USA v. Dupree Rich
as 20-1986
Defendant / Appellant:
DUPREE RICH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Bennie Rich
as 20-1709
Defendant / Appellant:
BENNIE RAY RICH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fred Wortman, III v. State of TN Board of Parole, et al
as 20-5718
Defendant / Appellee:
GAY GREGSON, ZANE DUNCAN, ROB CLARK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRED AUSTON WORTMAN, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
