Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
David Jamerson v. Kristopher Taskila, et al
as 22-1708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE JAMERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Assistant Deputy Warden, LANCE MILLER, Resident Unit Manager and others
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
David Jamerson v. Kristopher Taskila, et al
as 22-1599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE JAMERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Assistant Deputy Warden, LANCE MILLER, Resident Unit Manager and others
Michigan Corrections Organiza, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION, (MCO), Service Employees International Union, Local 526M, LORI AUGUSTINE, DENNIS BEECHAM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DANIEL H. HEYNS, acting in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections
Terrie Sizemore v. Ronald Forsthoefel, et al
as 13-4250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRIE SIZEMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD P. FORSTHOEFEL, Judge, FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF MID-AMERICA FLCA, GREGORY H. MELICK and others
Ronald Lapkewych v. Michigan Attorney General's Of
as 12-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD P. LAPKEWYCH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, Bill Schuette, Michigan Attorney General
Ronald Ellison, Jr. v. Denise Balinski, et al
as 09-2033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONALD P. ELLISON, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
DENISE BALINSKI
Defendant:
ELLA BULLY-CUMMINGS and CITY OF DETROIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
