Cases 1 - 10 of 739
Unique Brooks v. Felts, et al
as 24-5571
Plaintiff:
UNIQUE BROOKS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FELTS, Sued in their individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLEMAN, Sued in their individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LOWERY, Sued in their individual and official capacity and others
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
John Curran, III v. Carl Fronabarger, et al
as 24-5202
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. CURRAN, III
Defendant:
CARL A. FRONABARGER, STATE OF TENNESSEE, J. BRENT BRADBURY and others
Jennifer Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 24-5113
Petitioner:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, SHERIFF STEVE REAMS, WCSO and SHERIFF F/N/U HEYER, LCSO
USA v. James Watson
as 24-3002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES F. WATSON
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Jennifer Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 23-6073
Petitioner / Appellant:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent / Appellee:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, SHERIFF STEVE REAMS, WCSO and SHERIFF F/N/U HEYER, LCSO
USA v. Nathaniel Clark
as 23-3988
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHANIEL F. CLARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
