Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Freeman et al
as 2:2023cv11486
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miller
Defendant:
Eric Freeman and Burton, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeely v. Brooks et al
as 2:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Robbin McNeely
Defendant:
Anthony Brooks, Brian Warden, Dave Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Romeo v. City of Romulus et al
as 2:2019cv10545
Defendant:
Leroy Burcoff, Sgt. Bonnie Freeman, City of Romulus and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Romeo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv13720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Watson v. City of Burton, a Michigan municipal corporation et al
as 2:2017cv11833
Plaintiff:
Michael Clifton Watson
Defendant:
City of Burton, a Michigan municipal corporation , Burton Police Department , Detective Eric Freeman, Burton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2014cv13873
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gerald Freeman
Defendant:
A Hamilton , Kenneth Groat , Wyandotte, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv13858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv13770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeman et al v. Harding et al
as 1:2010cv12810
Plaintiff:
William Gregory Freeman, Sr , William Gregory Freeman, Jr , Kimberly Sue Freeman and others
Defendant:
Glen Harding and Caro, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
