Cases 1 - 10 of 126,379
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Scalise et al
as 4:2024cv12484
Defendant:
Michaela Frunek and Marianne Frunek Scalise
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Buhl v. Clement et al
as 2:2024cv12483
Plaintiff:
John Buhl
Defendant:
Julie Clement and Julianna Claydon
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Massarello v. Power Home Remodeling Group, LLC
as 2:2024cv12480
Defendant:
Power Home Remodeling Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nathan James Massarello
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zabik v. CContinent 8 Technologies
as 2:2024cv12473
Plaintiff:
Tanner Zabik
Defendant:
Continent 8 Technologies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller v. Corewell Health
as 2:2024cv12479
Defendant:
Corewell Health Beaumont Troy Hospital and Corewell Health
Plaintiff:
Dwight Kepler Miller, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Messer v. New York Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv12472
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Messer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ernst v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv12481
Plaintiff:
Julie Ernst
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
