Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Thurmond v. Larkin
as 1:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Dawan Pierce Thurmond
Defendant:
Andrea Andre Larkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Pierce v. Kalamazoo County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Perry Pierce
Defendant:
Kalamazoo County Jail and TelMate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce #F13921 v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv00543
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
Barack Obama, California Department of Corrections, California Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Pierce
Defendant:
Kent, County of and Kent County Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Getter #184843 v. Woods et al
as 2:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Michael Alaf Getter #184843
Defendant:
Jeff Woods, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stamps #209275 v. Perry et al
as 2:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Terah L. Stamps #209275
Defendant:
Unknown Curley, S. Hayden, Unknown Major and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v Haag
as 1:2011cv00737
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Defendant:
Brent Haag
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. MacLachlan
as 1:2010cv01113
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
James MacLachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catanzaro #313263 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Matthew Catanzaro #313263
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dennis Straub and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
