Cases 51 - 60 of 10,909
Burks v. Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency
as 2:2024cv02330
Defendant:
Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency and CSEA
Plaintiff:
Jordan Burks
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daville v. Broussard et al
as 2:2024cv02354
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daville
Defendant:
TransCanada USA Services Inc. and Rixey Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lange et al v. City of Piqua et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Alisha Lange, David Smith, Greg Neves and others
Defendant:
City of Piqua and Paul Oberdorfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
