Cases 61 - 70 of 151
Stanley v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2017oe00166
Plaintiff:
Emmalee Stanley
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Ohio Reformatory for Women, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. City of Newark, Ohio, Division of Police et al
as 2:2016cv01208
Plaintiff:
Marcy Irvin
Defendant:
City of Newark, Ohio, Division of Police and John Doe 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanaberg v. Licking County et al
as 2:2016cv01209
Plaintiff:
Ty Shanaberg
Defendant:
Licking County, Licking County Sheriffs Office, Randy Thorp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Urdak v. Caldwell et al
as 2:2016cv01135
Defendant:
Ryan Caldwell , Board of Education for Rolling Hills Local School District and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
John Urdak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Hatfield et al
as 1:2016cv00999
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gray
Defendant:
Jasen Hatfield , Butler County Sheriff , Mike Brockman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollin v. Brown County, et al.
as 1:2016cv00773
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hollin
Defendant:
Brown County, Dwayne Wenninger, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moe v. City of Logan Ohio et al
as 2:2016cv00654
Plaintiff:
Michael G Moe
Defendant:
City of Logan Ohio, Ethan Doerr and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moe v. City of Logan Ohio et al
as 2:2016oe00653
Plaintiff:
Michael G Moe
Defendant:
City of Logan Ohio, Ethan Doerr and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henley et al v. Wiehe et al
as 1:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Sexton Henley and Demetrius Pace
Defendant:
Thomas Wiehe, Raymond Tensing and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F. et al v. Perry County Children and Family Services et al
as 2:2015cv02731
Plaintiff:
M. F. , H. F. and Karisma Ferreira
Defendant:
Perry County Children and Family Services, Wendy L. Snider, Timothy A. Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
