Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Heid et al v. Aderholt et al
as 2:2020cv00901
Defendant:
Mrs. Wright, Mr./Mrs. Rosengarten, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Nobel et al
as 2:2019cv00763
Defendant:
Tony Robinson, Jones, Jeff Nobel and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery J. Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Madigan et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Kimberly Foxx, F/N/U Robinson, F/N/U Tyes and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boddie v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
Howard Boddie, Jr.
Defendant:
Charlotte Jenkins, Alice Ault, Norm Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manley v. Hughes et al
as 2:2018cv00310
Plaintiff:
Rammie Manley
Defendant:
L. Hughes, M. Filipowicz, Jo Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Montgomery County District 1 Courts et al
as 2:2017cv01034
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Montgomery County District 1 Courts, Montgomery County A.P.A. Post Release Control and Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Montgomery County District 1 Courts et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
David Robinson
Defendant:
Montgomery County District 1 Courts, Montgomery County A.P.A. Post Release Control and Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinkovitz v. Ralf Robinson Inc.
as 2:2017cv00616
Plaintiff:
Paul Sinkovitz
Defendant:
Ralf Robinson Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Ohio State of et al
as 1:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Marcos L. Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Ohio State of, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
