Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022oe00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kenney et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Maurice Kenney, Quinn Moore, Mary Zeiser and others
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Mayor John Cranley, City Manager Patrick Duhaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osterling v. Lakota Local School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00651
Defendant:
Lakota Local School District Board of Education, Todd Parnell, Kelley Casper and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Osterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burress-El v. Kelley et al
as 1:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
Antuan Burress-El
Defendant:
David Kelley and Melissa Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
