Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Freeman Jr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01914
Plaintiff:
Leonard Freeman Jr
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freeman v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv01862
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Couto, Jr. et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01488
Plaintiff:
Freeman Couto, Jr. and Cassandra Couto
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freeman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
DiAngelo Freeman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kynwulf v. Corcoran et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Alfar Kynwulf and Darryl Blankenship
Defendant:
Maureen Corcoran, Matt Damschroder, Robert Bryne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Freeman v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2023cv03244
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Freeman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and DAVOL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Freeman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02421
Plaintiff:
Calvin Leon Freeman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freeman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02079
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Freeman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Freeman v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mario Freeman
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgeson v. Freeman
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morgeson
Defendant:
Jonathan freeman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
