Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 535
Arvin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02909
Plaintiff: George Arvin
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasiloff v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02712
Plaintiff: Sr. George Vasiloff
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franko v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff: George Franko
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner: George Willis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rogers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01327
Plaintiff: George Rogers
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: John Holsen Miller
Defendant: George Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Altamirano et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff: Stacey Altamirano and George Altamirano
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
George v. The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: Amanda George
Defendant: The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Delong v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff: George Delong
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: George Johnston
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?