Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Burchfield v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Robert W Burchfield
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Corporal Reece LNU, Nurse Jones LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Edgar Goodwin
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shian, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Loudon County, Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Genny Jones
Defendant:
Loudon County, Tennessee and Officer Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stemeye v. USA
as 3:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
Kelly Jones Stemeye
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kyle et al v.
as 1:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Lowell H Kyle, Sr, Colton Drake Clingan, Larry Leland Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Donald H. Britt
Defendant:
Jeff Cassidy, Carswell, Brian Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Cline et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Defendant:
John Doe, Caleigh Cline, Brandon Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stacy
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Tommy Earl Jones
Defendant:
Officer Stacy and Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Parrish
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Richard Ross
Defendant:
Michael Parrish, Tenn. Department of Correction, Morgan County Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
