Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 101 - 110 of 6,622
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff: John Doe #056
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff: Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant: Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Rescue Mission et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff: William Howard
Defendant: Rescue Mission and Room In The Inn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00554
Plaintiff: Joe Doe
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff: William Howard
Defendant: TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff: Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant: Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Doe #53 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: John Doe #53
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli et al v. Hetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff: Connie Reguli and Wendy Hancock
Defendant: Tracy Hetzel, Estate of Kimberly Helper, Mary Katherine Evins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?