Cases 71 - 80 of 6,596
Frase v. Holt Development Co., LLC
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nile Frase
Defendant:
Holt Development Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Marable v Ascension St. Thomas et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Carl G. Marable
Defendant:
Ascension St. Thomas of Rutherford, Murfreesboro Police Department, Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Doe #061 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Doe #061
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 dd Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ashley et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Ashley, Katelyn Phillips, Deannia Keith and others
Defendant:
Coltan Jones, Sheriff Michael Reagon and Fentress County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Disclosure of Intimate Images
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
New Muslim Party
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
