Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Rucker v. Purviance et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Jim Purviance, Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Patrice McCaulley, Debra Bales, Philip Spence and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mason et al v. Hale et al
as 3:2021cv00476
Defendant:
Martha Burton and Floyd Jay Hale
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Morris and Lauren Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sake, LLC et al v. Cain et al
as 3:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sake, LLC and Seanache Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Knox Valley Partners, LLC, IRA Innovations, LLC, Tennessee Title & Escrow Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System v. Jamison et al
as 3:2020cv00874
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
George F. MacKenzie, Jr, Ricardo Cardenas, Thomas A. Kingsbury and others
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Morris et al
as 3:2020cv00319
Plaintiff:
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Defendant:
BTE USA, LLC, Robert L. Taylor, Jr., Tyree Morris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv01138
Defendant:
Tony Mays and Tony Parker
Plaintiff:
Oscar Smith, Pervis Payne, Henry Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nottingham v. Schliter et al
as 3:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Spencer Curtis, Southern Health Partners, Austin Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
