Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Maisano v. Coleman et al
as 3:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
f/n/u Coleman, Sandra Walker, Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Rocky McElhaney Law Firm et al
as 3:2015cv01509
Plaintiff:
David Michael Harris
Defendant:
Rocky McElhaney Law Firm, Hollins, Raybin, Weissman PC, Hughes & Coleman Lawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shearon v. Womack et al
as 3:2015cv01061
Plaintiff:
David Shearon
Defendant:
Coleman Womack and Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman et al v. Green Tree Servicing LLC
as 3:2015cv00851
Plaintiff:
Danny Coleman and Carla Coleman
Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Wells Fargo Banks, N.A. et al
as 3:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
George W. Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Banks, N.A. and Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01891
Plaintiff:
Hannah Elizabeth Coleman
Defendant:
Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. , Synthes USA Sales, LLC , Depuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McDougal et al v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
George McDougal, Jason Bryant and William C. Moss
Defendant:
Jason Woodall, Derrick Schofield, Tim Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01120
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Coleman and Katina Coleman
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
