Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. LUPPE et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
Heather Huppe, CAPTAIN BRIAN CAVE, KATIE CAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Marlon Walls
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. DICKSON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
Dickson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Walls
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Taylor et al v. Macon County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 2:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Taylor, Chester L. Loudy, Scottie W. Griffin and others
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Department, The doing business as Macon County Jail, Sheriff Mark Gammons, Scotty Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
