Cases 41 - 50 of 7,294
Gomez-Castro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Luis Gomez-Castro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Simmons v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clum v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
David Clum, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luther v. Chochran et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jayson Lance Luther
Defendant:
Chochran, Dorton and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elnour v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02284
Petitioner:
Mohamed Elnour
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelton v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
James Michael Shelton
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strada, Danny H. Goodman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harris
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, WellPath, LLC, Carolyn Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Ortega v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02185
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Ortega
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
