Cases 31 - 40 of 142
Coleman v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02002
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bernard Coleman
Miscellaneou:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Holt v. Millington Police Dept. et al
as 2:2015cv02534
Plaintiff:
Valerie Holt
Defendant:
Millington Police Dept., Tim Russell, Rick Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cheairs v. Bond et al
as 1:2015cv01063
Plaintiff:
Michael Elvis Cheairs
Defendant:
Melvin Bond, Rachelle Gibson, Tonya Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Coleman
as 2:2015cv02050
Petitioner:
Sammie Lee Jones
Defendant:
James Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maness v. Rezac et al
as 1:2014cv01240
Defendant:
Frank Rezac, Cody Coleman, Mark Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Maness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Shelby Co. Division of Correction Center et al
as 2:2014cv02660
Plaintiff:
William Walton
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Division of Correction Center, Connie Flets Raynor, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craven v. Coleman American Moving Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02596
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services, Inc. and Terrace D. Strickland
Plaintiff:
Vicki S. Craven
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark Luttrell, Jr., James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Shelby County Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02500
Petitioner:
Abraham Mitchell
Respondent:
Shelby County Corrections, Coleman, Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
