Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Green v. Schofield et al
as 2:2013cv02715
Plaintiff:
James Green
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Stanley Dickerson, Robert Munford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02640
Petitioner:
Christopher Tate
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tate v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02290
Petitioner:
Antoya Tate
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tate v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv02156
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tate
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Ledic Management Group, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv03039
Plaintiff:
Natalie T. Smith
Defendant:
Ledic Management Group, LLC, Hillcrest Memphis, L.P. and Sarah Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Young v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2012cv02493
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Young
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee, Louis J. Montesi, Jr., M. Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv01138
Petitioner:
Johnny D Tate
Defendant:
Nancy Jones and The Board of Professional Responsibility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tate v. Shelby County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2012cv02187
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tate
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Facility, Bass and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Shelby County Dept. of Corr. et al
as 2:2011cv03040
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Barlow, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Dept. of Corr., Correct Care Solutions, Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
