Cases 21 - 30 of 408
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 22-1383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BUCHER, WILLIAM BYRWA, BILL DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, FCA US, LLC, ALPHONS IACOBELLI and others
Clervrain et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv10743
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir, Biglauwick Plaisimond and others
Defendant:
Gary Peters, Debbie Stabenow, Andy Levin and others
Craig v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Earl Craig
Defendant:
William Lee, David Rausch and Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Randall Carter
as 22-5196
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL CRAIG CARTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Craig Marr
as 22-1104
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CRAIG JAMES MARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Gayla Grise v. Stewart County, TN School Sys, et al
as 21-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAYLA GRISE
Defendant / Appellee:
STEWART COUNTY, TN SCHOOL SYSTEM, MICHAEL CRAIG, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of Schools and DOCTOR BEN DUNCAN, Individually and in his official capacity as Principal of Stewart High School
Macking Nettles, Jr. v. Craig Wallis, et al
as 21-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACKING NETTLES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG WALLIS, Prison Guard, MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL GIMPLE, SERGEANT PORTICE and others
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
