Cases 51 - 60 of 2,407
American Plastics LLC v. Hummel et al.
as 3:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
American Plastics LLC
Defendant:
Eric Hummel, Findlay Machine & Tool Inc., Kreate Extrusion, LLC and others
May v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
as 5:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
TRACEY MAY
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc, Bridgestone Corporation, Continental Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Anderson v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al.
as 5:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Christine Anderson
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
John Doe #1 (EDB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (EDB) and John Doe #2 (WEB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe #1 (LWB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (LWB), John Doe #2 (DBB) and John Doe #3 (BAR)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gilliam v. Prince Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Steven Gilliam
Defendant:
Prince Health Group LLC and John Doe Lead Generator Identified as "P1 Solutions"
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe (WEA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WEA)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (DJB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
John Doe (DJB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
