Cases 121 - 130 of 12,883
Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettus v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Alan Michael Pettus
Defendant:
Brent White, Sam Adams, Seth P'pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Carter County Detention Center
as 0:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Ward
Defendant:
Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
John Raymond Ast
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mitchem v. Woosley et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ryan R. Mitchem
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Troy Perkins and Gary Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
