Cases 131 - 140 of 17,797
Allen v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Bryan S. Allen
Defendant:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taper v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Joshua Taper
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. May
as 4:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Taquashone Ray
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. USA
as 5:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Woods v. Brown et al.
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
George Woods
Defendant:
Major Brown, Deputy Swartz and C/O John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oppy et al
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M Smith
Defendant:
Mr. J. Oppy, Mr. Chinn, Mr. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bauer v. USA
as 3:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
William R. Bauer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bivins v. USA
as 5:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Dramane D. Bivins, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Philpott v. City of Stow et al.
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Michael Philpott
Defendant:
City of Stow, Stephan W. Miller, Samantha R. Wike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gulley v. Howell et al.
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jesse-James Gulley, Jr.
Defendant:
Aaron P. Howell, James S. Gwin, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
