Cases 11 - 20 of 24,576
Miller v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 3:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
Justin Ray Miller
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, District Attorneys Office and Rutherford County Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michelle Shoemaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips, Tennessee Department of Correction and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. USA
as 2:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Katrina Reshina Lanier
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01115
Petitioner:
William Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Terry v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02373
Petitioner:
Princess Terry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02374
Petitioner:
Alford Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Department of Children Services et al
as 1:2024cv01116
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Department of Children Services, Cynthia Herman, Jimmy Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00683
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaw v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shaw
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC and Alexie Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Leeds
as 3:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Terrance Lawrence
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
