Cases 21 - 30 of 961
Avery v. Fitz
as 1:2024cv01007
Petitioner:
David A. Avery
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Sergeant David Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Marshal Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Clerk's Office, Metro Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Core Civics of America
as 3:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
David Bonner
Defendant:
Core Civics of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray Young
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Tommy Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Lincoln County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Cox
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail and David Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Givans v. United States
as 3:2023cv01121
Petitioner:
David Givans
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
