Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Burger Mgmt Systems WA, Inc., et al v. Seawend, LTD, et al
as 24-3148
Plaintiff:
BURGER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WASHINGTON, INC. and SMS HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Defendant:
SEAWEND, LTD, CEDAR ENTERPRISES, INC., J. DAVID KARAM and others
FCT-MM, LLC et al v. Idacorp Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02593
Plaintiff:
FCT-MM, LLC and FCT-SM, LLC
Defendant:
Idacorp Financial Services, Inc., Fallbrook Companies, LLC, Forest Creek Managing Member LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc et al v. Seawend, Ltd. et al
as 2:2021cv01134
Defendant:
Seawend, Ltd., J. David Karam, Cedar Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
SMS Holdings Corporation and Burger Management Systems Washington, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernimos v. ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services, L. P. et al
as 2:2018cv10083
Plaintiff:
Mary Fernimos
Defendant:
ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services, L. P. and SM Clean, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Covenant Steel Warehouse, Inc. v. SMS Siemag AG
as 3:2013cv02486
Plaintiff:
Covenant Steel Warehouse, Inc.
Defendant:
SMS Siemag AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tekfor, Inc. v. SMS Meer Service, Inc.
as 5:2012cv01341
Plaintiff:
Tekfor, Inc.
Defendant:
SMS Meer Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Longway v. Sanborn Map Company et al
as 3:2010cv00896
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Longway
Defendant:
Sanborn Map Company , Applied Geographics Inc. and SM Baldwin Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMS Demag LLC v. ICON Construction Company, Inc
as 09-3458
Petitioner - Appellee:
SMS DEMAG LLC
Respondent - Appellant:
ICON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
SMS Demag LLC v. ICON Construction Company, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00028
Petitioner:
SMS Demag LLC
Respondent:
ICON Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
