Cases 141 - 150 of 583
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 2.77 Acres of Lane et al
as 3:2017cv01348
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 2.77 Acres of Land, More Or Less, and Additional Rights With Respect To A Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Overland In Montgomery County, Tennessee, TriStar Bank, Ted H. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC v. 0.4 Acres +/- Permanent Easement and 0.8 Acres +/- Temporary Easement of Land in Augusta Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan et al
as 4:2017cv13220
Plaintiff:
NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
0.4 Acres +/- Permanent Easement and 0.8 Acres +/- Temporary Easement of Land in Augusta Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan, M & BK, LLC , 0.3 Acres +/- Permanent Easement and 0.3 Acres +/- Temporary Easement of Land in Ypsilanti Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC v. 2.00 Acres Permanent Easement, and 3.2 Acres Temporary Easement of Land in City of Green, Summit County, Ohio Easement, And 3.2 Acres Temporary Easement Of Land et al.
as 5:2017cv02062
Plaintiff:
Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
2.00 Acres Permanent Easement, and 3.2 Acres Temporary Easement of Land in City of Green, Summit County, Ohio, Aqua Ohio, Inc., Duck Creek Energy Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Western Reserve Land Conservancy
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC v. 0.8 Acres +/- Permanent Easement, and 0.7 Acres +/- Temporary Easement of Land in City of New Franklin, Summit County, Ohio et al
as 5:2017cv02066
Plaintiff:
Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
0.8 Acres +/- Permanent Easement, and 0.7 Acres +/- Temporary Easement of Land in City of New Franklin, Summit County, Ohio, Gary K. Calvert, KeyBank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 1.63 Acre of Land et al
as 3:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 1.63 Acre of Land, Bryan L. Hall , Bradley D. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.29 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Morgan County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.29 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Morgan County, Tennessee, Trustees of the Cincinnati Southern Railway, City of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Waldock et al v. Rover Pipeline LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00959
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waldock , Kenneth Stearns , Jane M. Stearns and others
Defendant:
Rover Pipeline LLC , ET Rover Pipeline LLC, Precision Pipeline, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Leffel v. Village of Casstown
as 3:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Leffel
Defendant:
Village of Casstown
Counter_claimant:
Village of Casstown
Counter_defendant:
Thomas E. Leffel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. 5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000 et al
as 2:2017oe00108
Defendant:
5.46 Acres of Land, More or Less in Belmont County, Ohio OH-BE-CC-002.000, Ruth Anne Kanzig, Ricki Frederica Fulton and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC
as 5:2017cv00231
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
10.55 Acres of Land, More or Less in Ashland County, OHio OH-AS-005.000, Wayne Ralph Bartter, Trustee of the Wayne Ralph Bartter Trust dated April 28, 2008, Wayne Ralph Bartter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
