Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Nantz et al
as 6:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Otis Nantz, Winnie Nantz, Capital One Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Steel v. M & T Bank
as 1:2015cv01867
Plaintiff:
Otis Steel, Jr.
Defendant:
M & T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Otis Williams v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 14-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Otis Jackson v. WMC Mortgage Corp., et al
as 13-6632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WMC MORTGAGE CORP., WMC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERS, ARNOLD M. WEISS and others
Williams v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 2:2013cv10832
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Jackson v. WMC Mortgage, Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv02914
Plaintiff:
Otis Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
WMC Mortgage, Corp., Mortgage Electronic Registration System , Arnold M. Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Otis et al
as 5:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Otis, Unknown Surviving Spouse of Gwen Otis , Unknown Spouse Of Richard Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Williams et al v. Mekiel-Yehuddah:Yisrael
as 2:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Federal National Mortgage Association , J. Skipper Ray and others
Defendant:
Mekiel-Yehuddah:Yisrael
Miscellaneou:
Otis Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Kennedy et al
as 6:2010cv00309
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Otis Kennedy, Beatrice Kennedy, The Unknown Spouse of Beatrice Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
RRE VIP Borrower, LLC v. Bingham Building Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
RRE VIP Borrower, LLC
Defendant:
Bingham Building Limited Partnership, Bingham Parking, LLC, Bingham-Burnside, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
