Cases 21 - 30 of 33
King v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Joann O. King
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joanne M. Martin
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greene v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01202
Plaintiff:
Joanne H. Greene
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burdette v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00785
Plaintiff:
Joann Virginia Burdette
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailes v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Bailes
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mancuso v. OSF International, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Joann Mancuso
Defendant:
OSF International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byargeon v. Sanborn et al
as 1:2014cv00512
Defendant:
Joanne Sanborn and Kent Sanborn
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Byargeon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Byrne, et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al
as 12-3808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JOHN BYRNE and CODY BYRNE
Plaintiff:
JOANN BYRNE and AETNA
Defendant - Appellee:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., GERALD R. HORN, JOHN DOES, 2-10 (John Doe 1 named in Amended Complaint) and others
Boylan v. Beulah, Village of
as 1:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Boylan
Defendant:
Beulah, Village of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Byrne, et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc., et al
as 3:2009cv00919
Plaintiff:
Charles John Byrne, Charles John Byrne, Joann Byrne and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., Gerald R. Horn and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
