Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Abney et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Danny Abney , Janice Abney and Bureau of Workers' Compensation State of Ohio
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Foran v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Foran
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roney v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00482
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Roney
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teague et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2015cv00129
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
John E Teague and Chrystal Teague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramsey et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Boyd Merville Ramsey and Evelyn Marie Ramsey
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hallenstein v. Home Depot et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hallenstein
Defendant:
The Home Depot and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doll et al v. Home Depot, Inc., The et al
as 1:2014cv02848
Plaintiff:
Neil E Doll and Beulah Doll
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., The , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and HD Development of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruhl v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (PLR2)
as 3:2014cv00449
Plaintiff:
Carol Ruhl
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caffey v. The Home Depot et al
as 3:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Litha Caffey
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Home Depot, The Home Depot, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2013cv02840
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Armstrong and James Armstrong
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
