Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Anderson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Paris R Anderson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ablan v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Charles John Ablan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cecil and William Cecil
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scruggs v. Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05781
Defendant:
Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Estate of Karen Scruggs and Mr. Thomas Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2020cv05543
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Kelly Amanda Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garvin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00714
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, American Medical Systems, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and others
Plaintiff:
Janna Garvin and Michael David Garvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCabe v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2020cv05112
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ms. Bridget A. McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Page v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04969
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
stephen Page, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nettle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04968
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Nettle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steinhoff v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00156
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Steinhoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
