Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Connie McGirr, et al v. Thomas Rehme, et al
as 17-3519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONNIE MCGIRR, MARY ANN BAILEY, DEBBIE CARMAN-STATON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS F. REHME and WAITE, SCHNEIDER, BAYLESS & CHESLEY COMPANY, L.P.A., an Ohio Corporation
Defendant:
STANLEY M. CHESLEY
Carter et al v.LL&B Headwater II, LP
as 2:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Julius Carter and Julius Carter, as executor of the Estate of Theresa E. Carter, deceased
Defendant:
LL&B Headwater II, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGirr et al v. Rehme et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Connie McGirr , Mary Ann Bailey , Debbie Carman-Staton and others
Defendant:
Thomas F. Rehme , Waite, Schneider, Bayless, & Chesley Co., LPA and Stanley M. Chesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 3:2015cv01528
Plaintiff:
David Michael Harris
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, Debora Holland, Micheal Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Rogers et al
as 3:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
James Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Nicole Rogers, Barbara Carter, Raymond C Patter, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rogers et al
as 1:2015cv00638
Plaintiff:
James Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Nicole Rogers, Barbara Carter, Raymond C Patter, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orlando Carter, et al v. Deutsche Bank
as 14-3634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO CARTER
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CASTELLANOS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEUTSCHE BANK, Trustee on behalf of Long Beach Mortgage
Cardional Carter v. US Bank in Bexley, et al
as 12-4328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARDIONAL ANNA VINES CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
US BANK IN BEXLEY and US BANK CARDS SERVERS
Cardional Carter v. Night Management and Gap Prote, et al
as 12-4320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARDIONAL ANNA VINES CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
NIGHT MANAGEMENT AND GAP PROTECTION and H&E THE FIRM OF HALLOWER & EB BESKOTTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
