Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Shultz v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00947
Plaintiff:
Joe Shultz
Defendant:
Clayton Smith, Mickey Miller and Diamond Seal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Morris Aviation, LLC, et al v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, I
as 12-6021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS AVIATION, LLC
Plaintiff:
MASCARO AVIATION, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Hinton v. Teodosio et al
as 5:2012cv01267
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hinton
Defendant:
Linda Tucci Teodosio, James Whited, Scott Rubes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris Aviation, LLC, et al v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, I
as 10-6047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS AVIATION, LLC
Plaintiff:
MASCARO AVIATION, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.
DSM Leasing, Inc. et al v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
DSM Leasing, Inc. , Cary N. Mariash , Twinstar Partners, LLC and others
Defendant:
Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris Aviation, LLC v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00644
Plaintiff:
Morris Aviation, LLC and Morris Aviation, LLC
Defendant:
Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lowry et al v. Morgan-Mains Appraisal Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Lowry, Jr., David Lowry, Jr., Karen Lowry and others
Defendant:
Morgan-Mains Appraisal Service, Inc., Christopher S Miller, Steve McBrayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Furman et al v. Codiam, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00790
Plaintiff:
Shelby Furman, Shelby Furman, Shelby Furman and others
Defendant:
Codiam, Inc., E. Schreiber, Inc., Cora Diamond Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
