Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Lisa Bridge, et al v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB, et al
as 13-4226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA BRIDGE and WILLIAM W. BRIDGE, III
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AAMES CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Chau et al v. Ball et al
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Alan Ut Chau and Huong N. Chau
Defendant:
Kenton L. Ball , William W. James , Ann L. Kilcoyne and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Williams v. Betten-Friendly Motors Company
as 1:2012cv01004
Plaintiff:
Bertha Williams
Defendant:
Betten-Friendly Motors Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Williams, Jr et al v. VOLT 2012-NPL1 Asset Holdings Trust et al
as 1:2012cv01446
Plaintiff:
Earl Williams, Jr and Viveca G Williams
Defendant:
VOLT 2012-NPL1 Asset Holdings Trust and Vericrest Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Diana Williams v. Citimortgage Inc.
as 11-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANA WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIMORTGAGE INC.
Williams v. Delamar Car Co.
as 1:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Essence Williams
Defendant:
Delamar Car Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Moya v. Williams Cars, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Moya
Defendant:
Williams Cars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Williams v. Bank of America Home Loan
as 2:2010cv10627
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Bank of America Home Loan
Printy v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2009cv14845
Plaintiff:
William Printy
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Larry Melton, et al v. Bank of Lexington, et al
as 09-6246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY STEVE MELTON and R & J OF TENNESSEE, INC.
Plaintiff:
LARRY S. MELTON
Defendant:
BANK OF LEXINGTON, branch of the Bank of Friendship, TERESA HARRIS, B&H INVESTMENTS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID RIDDICK and HOLMES, RICH, SIGLER & RIDDICK, P.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
