Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dawson v. General Electric Haire Company
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Dawson
Defendant:
General Electric Haire Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Michael Walden v. General Electric International, Inc., et al
as 24-5141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WALDEN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., aka General Electric, aka General Electric Aviation and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, CLC
Washington v. General Electric
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
General Electric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zelesnik v. Rice et al
as 1:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Ralph Kirkpatrick, General Electric Co Eggs Div. Tax Division, Doug Ferry and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walden v. General Electric International, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00159
Defendant:
General Electric International, Inc., General Electric, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Walden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Zelesnik v. Laverty et al
as 1:2018cv02360
Defendant:
Jamie Jacobs, Calle Laverty, Bob Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zelesnik et al v. General Motors et al
as 1:2018cv02165
Defendant:
GE Capital, Current Speaker Paul Ryan, General Motors and others
Plaintiff:
Roy D Zelesnik and Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zelesnik v. GE (General Electric) et al
as 1:2018cv00433
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
GE (General Electric), John Flannery, Wright Patterson Air Force Base and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetria Kaufman v. GE
as 17-5733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIA KAUFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Isell Witherspoon v. GE
as 17-3515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISELL WITHERSPOON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
