Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Chacon et al
as 1:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Chacon , James Feldman , Stephen Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Stephen Lewis Corbin, et al
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Lewis Corbin , William Kenneth Corbin and Balinda Brannon Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Schnorbus et al
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Craig Schnorbus and Kathlyn N. Schnorbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Christi, et al
as 2:2010cv13130
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Orion House, Incorporated, Nicholas P. Christi, Philip N Christi and others
Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. v. Schroeder
as 3:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
Buckeye Cablevision, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen P. Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Mallie et al
as 5:2008cv14452
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen E Mallie and SEM Enterprises, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Mallie et al
as 2:2008cv14298
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen E Mallie and SEM Enterprises, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
J&J Sports Productions, Incorporated v. Mallie et al
as 2:2008cv13024
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Incorporated
Defendant:
Stephen E Mallie and SEM Enterprises, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Sotkovsky
as 2:2007cv00944
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sotkovsky and Hooligans Bar & Grill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
