Cases 121 - 130 of 290
Howard v. Department of Corrections
as 4:2012cv00112
Petitioner:
Michael Dale Howard
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akrawi v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2012cv13977
Petitioner:
Louis Akrawi
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board and Michigan Department of Corrections
Chestnut v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00267
Petitioner:
Oreece Lamarr Chestnut
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections and Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Smith v. Steve Haney, et al
as 12-5964
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM G. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HANEY and KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Larry Harrison, Jr. v. Gregory Forest
as 12-2019
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY TARONE HARRISON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GREGORY FOREST, Probation Agent, Michigan Department of Corrections
Smith v. Haney et al
as 5:2012cv00107
Petitioner:
William G. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Haney and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gamble v. Perry et al
as 5:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Otter Creek Correction Complex, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Gamble v. Perry et al
as 7:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Otter Creek Correction Complex, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hudson v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv01695
Petitioner:
Tonio Hudson
Respondent:
Ohio Department of Corrections and Ohio State Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffery Carpenter v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-5687
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY L. CARPENTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GARY BECKSTROM, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
