Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Vincent Ongori v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 17-1146
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT ONGORI, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Respondent - Appellee:
REBECCA ADDUCCI, Field Office Director, DETROIT IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Kusk v. Unknown Party
as 1:2016cv01408
Petitioner:
Carol Sue Kusk
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bevins v. Becker County, Minnesota et al
as 4:2016cv02942
Plaintiff:
Corey Bevins
Defendant:
Becker County, Minnesota, Becker County Jail, Becker County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragland #713098 v. Place et al
as 2:2016cv00075
Petitioner:
James Ragland #713098
Respondent:
Shane Place, Oh Chung, Gloria Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tamburino #268269 v. Unknown Party
as 1:2015cv01111
Plaintiff:
Dominic Tamburino #268269
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kamps v. Passenger et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Petitioner:
Bruce Kamps, Ray Cox and James Courtate
Respondent:
Donald Passenger, 61st District Court of the State of Michigan and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kemp v. Unknown Party
as 1:2015cv00406
Petitioner:
William Frederick Kemp, Jr.
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White et al v. Lawson et al
as 2:2015cv10266
Petitioner:
Jimmie White, II and Wanda White
Respondent:
David M. Lawson, Kevin Mulcahy and Unknown Federal Facility
Thompson v. Unknown Party
as 1:2014cv01170
Petitioner:
Demon Thompson
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Runion v. Unknown Party #1, et al
as 14-2168
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES DARWIN RUNION
Respondent - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as United States Congress Chairman, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General, BILL SCHUETTE, Mich. Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
