Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Trice #192845 v. Koehler et al
as 1:2024cv00856
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER John Eldridge Trice #192845
Respondent:
Brian L. Mackin, Ronald Koehler, Ypsilanti Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tompkins #518783 v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv00719
Respondent:
David A. Thompson, Jennifer Houke-Born, Michael Burgess and others
Petitioner:
Boston Jermaine Tompkins #518783
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Campbell
as 2:2024cv11567
Respondent:
Noah Nagy
Petitioner:
Michael H. Jones
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
William Baker v. Angela Hunsinger-Stuff
as 23-3273
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. BAKER
Respondent / Appellee:
ANGELA HUNSINGER-STUFF, Warden
Kyle Cooper v. George Stephenson
as 23-1052
Petitioner / Appellant:
KYLE H. COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden
Kyle Cooper v. George Stephenson
as 23-1051
Petitioner / Appellant:
KYLE H. COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGE STEPHENSON, Warden
Javier Armengau v. Jenny Hildebrand
as 22-4049
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVIER H. ARMENGAU
Respondent / Appellee:
JENNY HILDEBRAND, Warden
Gibson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
Paul H Gibson
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 2:2022cv04137
Petitioner:
Paul H Gibson
Respondent:
WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Bureau of Prisons, RRM Cincinnati, Residential Reentry Office
as 1:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
Michael H Ingram
Respondent:
RRM Cincinnati and Bureau of Prisons, RRM Cincinnati, Residential Reentry Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
