Cases 1 - 10 of 294
Wood v. King
as 2:2023cv12674
Petitioner:
Matthew Jay Wood, I
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Chris King
Dixon v. Chapman
as 5:2023cv11474
Petitioner:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Willis Chapman
Jenkins v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv02384
Petitioner:
Eric Tyrone Jenkins
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chandler v. Fine et al
as 2:2023cv02325
Plaintiff:
Rashad Chandler
Defendant:
Sergeant Robert Fine, Lieutenant F/N/U Ivory, Sergeant F/N/U Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mart v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Bobby Mart, Jr.
Respondent:
Kentucky Department of Corrections and Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyler v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Isaiah Tyler
Respondent:
Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mart v. Kentucky Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
Bobby Hanson Mart, Jr.
Respondent:
Kentucky Department of Corrections and Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10124
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Williams v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv12923
Petitioner:
David J. Williams
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Appling v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv13040
Petitioner:
Donald Darnell Appling
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
