Cases 1 - 10 of 466
Jacob Weld v. Melinda Braman
as 24-1449
Petitioner:
JACOB JOHN WELD
Respondent:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024mc00018
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ryan Widmer v. Jossette Okereke
as 24-3054
Petitioner:
RYAN K. WIDMER
Respondent:
JOSSETTE OKEREKE, Warden
Clinton v. Harrison
as 2:2023cv02754
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richards v. Hildebrand
as 2:2023cv03544
Plaintiff:
Kendall K Richards
Defendant:
Jenny Hildebrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sealy v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Dessalines Sealy
Respondent:
The United States of America, Ebonoluwa A. Taiwo, Timothy S. Mungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinton v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02548
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richards v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv02595
Petitioner:
Kendall K. Richards
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashanti Guy v. Melinda Braman
as 23-1513
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASHANTI R. GUY and ASHANTI RADEEF GUY
Respondent / Appellee:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden, Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
