Cases 211 - 220 of 604
Awkal v. Morgan
as 1:2012cv01413
Petitioner:
Abdul Awkal
Respondent:
Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Colson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv02333
Petitioner:
Andrew Thomas
Respondent:
Roland Colson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Bies v. Margaret Bagley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-3457
Petitioner - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
MICHAEL BIES
Respondent - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
MARGARET BAGLEY, Warden
In re: Kenneth Smith
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-3425
Petitioner - Movant:
In re: KENNETH W. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER
Michael Bies v. Margaret Bagley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-3431
Petitioner - Appellee:
MICHAEL BIES
Respondent - Appellant:
MARGARET BAGLEY, Warden
Bane v. Colson
as 2:2012cv02217
Petitioner:
John Michael Bane
Respondent:
Ronald Colson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Warden Franklin Medical Center
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012cv00196
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Franklin Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sheppard v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012cv00198
Petitioner:
Bobby T. Sheppard
Defendant:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.