Cases 101 - 110 of 165
Bays et al v. Montmorency, County of et al
as 1:2015cv10534
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bays and Jeffrey Bays
Defendant:
Montmorency, County of , Montmorency County Sheriff's Department , Bruce C. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weddle v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rusty Weddle
Defendant:
Bobby Dunbar, Gary Robertson, Russell County, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burley v. FBOP et al
as 6:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Martin Burley
Defendant:
FBOP, C. Eichenlaub, Richard Ives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 6:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Harlan, D.O. et al
as 2:2014cv01553
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Doctor Harlan, D.O., John and Jane Doe, Sgt. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Boggs et al
as 0:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Fleming Logan, Jr.
Defendant:
R.W. Boggs, Carter County, KY and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. USA et al
as 6:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Stephen Desmund Peterson
Defendant:
USA, USP-Victorville Medical Staff, USP-McCreary Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Neel v. Bullitt County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2014cv00415
Plaintiff:
Franklin Neel
Defendant:
Bullitt County, Kentucky , Martha Knox , Capisano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burse v. Robinson et al
as 2:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Perrin Burse
Defendant:
Norman Robinson, Lt. Ball, Lt. Eiring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jamal Murray
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Corrections, Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution, Lebanon Correctional Institution Medical Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
