Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff:
Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant:
Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron Young v. Dean Mulvaine, et al
as 22-3733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON E. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN MULVAINE, Correctional Counselor at NCCC, BENJAMIN BLANKENSHIP, Correctional counselor at NCC, in Marion C&D Unit, RUBEN QUINTERO, Major at NCCC and others
Reed v. Plancic et al
as 3:2020cv00577
Defendant:
Cindy Cossey, Ryan Caulfield, Ember Eyster and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Mulvaine et al
as 3:2018cv02807
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Sergeant A. Flores, Lorri Shuler and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Baskas et al
as 3:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Elena Baskas, Karen Barcklay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Chris Johnson, Corizon Health Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. Barchlay-Dodson et al
as 3:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Karen Barchlay-Dodson, Elijah Jordan M.D., Corizon Health Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
