Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Stephen Phillips
Defendant:
FNU Anderson, FNU New Case Manager of K Pod, FNU Faulkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv01171
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Jones, f/n/u Mann, Warden f/n/u Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lynn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hall et al
as 3:2020cv00581
Defendant:
f/n/u Malone, f/n/u Mann, Warden f/n/u Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lynn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
John Boatfield, Bruce Smiley, Lamont Johnson and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Lincoln County Sheriff's Department Medical Staff
as 4:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Randall Corely, Sr. and Randall Corley, Sr.
Defendant:
Susan Crews, Murry Blackwelder, Emily Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Lee et al
as 2:2017cv00159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wallace
Defendant:
Randy Lee, Hampton, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Manqru et al
as 3:2016cv03137
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jones
Defendant:
Jason Manqru, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C., Wilmington Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Cook et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mann
Defendant:
Doug Cook, Deberry Special Needs Facility, Darren Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Sullivan County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Ernest Gene Mann
Defendant:
Sullivan County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
