Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman-Green v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DaQuan Coleman-Green
Defendant:
Karl Jackson and Jail Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Davidson County Sheriff Office
as 3:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lewis Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Parris
as 3:2022mc00049
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman and Welsey Dawone Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris, FNU Olroyed, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whiteside v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Cederick Whiteside
Defendant:
Jeff Smith, Jackie Bausman, Sandra Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Boyd et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Bert Boyd, A.W. Cobble, Cutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweatt v. Hininger et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Sweatt
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Warden Grady Perry, f/n/u Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Dowling et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Shawn Dannels, Daron Hall, Jack E. Dowling and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
