Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
James Gandy, Jr. v. David LeMaster, et al
as 24-5060
Plaintiff:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID LEMASTER, RANDA MOORMAN and TERRI BOYD
James Gandy, Jr. v. David LeMaster, et al
as 24-5055
Plaintiff:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID LEMASTER, RANDA MOORMAN and TERRI BOYD
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02214
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Christopher Bina, Warden David Lemaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
William H Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Gregory Patton, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden David Lemaster, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pierre v. LeMaster et al
as 0:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Frantz Pierre
Defendant:
David LeMaster, A. Becker and Ashland Federal Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gandy v. LeMaster et al
as 0:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Gandy, Jr.
Defendant:
David LeMaster, Randa Moorman and Terri Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Myers v. FCI Ashland, et al
as 22-6111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD S. MYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FCI ASHLAND, DAVID LEMASTER, Warden and [UNKNOWN] ISSACS, CMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
